The Hermes Lijn 171, a once-familiar route traversing a significant stretch of the Amsterdam metropolitan area, held a vital role in connecting diverse communities. This route, which ran from Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA, through Ouderkerk aan de Amstel, Amstelveen, and Bovenkerk, ultimately terminating in Aalsmeer, offered a crucial transportation link for residents and commuters. While the specific route configuration no longer exists in its original form, understanding its history and the services it once provided offers valuable insight into the evolution of public transportation in the region. This article delves into the specifics of the Lijn 171, exploring its schedule (dienstregeling), its significance, and its impact on the surrounding communities. We will also consider the broader context of the Hermes bus network, including the current Hermes dienstregeling 2023 and how the legacy of Lijn 171 informs today's public transit landscape.
The Route and its Significance:
Lijn 171 provided a vital connection between the bustling Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA, a major transportation hub, and the more residential areas of Ouderkerk aan de Amstel, Amstelveen, Bovenkerk, and Aalsmeer. This route served diverse populations, encompassing commuters traveling to and from Amsterdam, residents relying on public transit for daily needs, and visitors exploring the region. The route's length and the variety of locations it served highlight its importance in the overall public transportation network. The journey from the Bijlmer ArenA, a significant transportation hub with connections to the metro and other bus routes, to the quieter suburban areas of Aalsmeer, demonstrated the Lijn 171's role in bridging the gap between urban and suburban life.
The mention that the "traject tussen Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA en Amstelveen Busstation werd alleen…" (the section between Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA and Amstelveen Bus Station was only…) suggests a potential limitation or specific characteristic of the service. Without further details, it is difficult to fully interpret this statement. It could imply that this segment was operated with a different frequency or type of bus than the rest of the route, perhaps a more frequent service due to higher demand. It could also indicate limitations on accessibility, perhaps due to specific road conditions or operational constraints. This ambiguity highlights the importance of detailed historical documentation of public transport routes to fully understand their operational nuances.
Hermes Bus Dienstregeling and the Lijn 171 Schedule:
Unfortunately, without access to the specific historical Hermes dienstregeling for Lijn 171, we cannot provide a precise timetable. However, a typical dienstregeling for a bus route of this length would have included information such as:
* Departure times: Listing the departure times from each stop along the route, typically with varying frequencies throughout the day, potentially with increased frequency during peak hours (rush hour) and reduced frequency during off-peak hours.
* Arrival times: Corresponding arrival times at each stop, reflecting the travel time between stops and accounting for potential delays.
* Days of operation: Specifying the days of the week the route operated, potentially with variations on weekends or public holidays.
* Route map: A visual representation of the route, showing all stops and the order in which they were serviced.
* Transfer information: Information on connections to other bus routes, metro lines, or train stations at key stops along the route.
current url：https://qosedg.k748s.com/all/bustijden-hermes-lijn-171-38790